From Mystery to Medicine: Case Studies in Anomalous Medical PresentationsAnomalous medical presentations — cases that defy standard diagnostic patterns — are both the bane and the boon of clinical practice. They frustrate clinicians because established algorithms and heuristics fail, but they also advance medicine by forcing deeper inquiry, refining diagnostic skills, and sometimes revealing entirely new diseases, syndromes, or mechanisms. This article surveys several illustrative case studies, highlights key diagnostic strategies when facing anomalous presentations, discusses ethical and system-level considerations, and outlines how such cases shape medical knowledge and training.
What makes a presentation “anomalous”?
Anomalous presentations deviate from expected symptom clusters, timeline, response to treatment, or epidemiology. They may result from:
- Atypical manifestations of common diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction presenting with indigestion rather than chest pain).
- Rare diseases or syndromes not usually considered in differential diagnoses.
- Overlapping comorbidities that mask or alter classic signs.
- Unrecognized environmental, toxic, or iatrogenic causes.
- Cognitive biases and system failures that misdirect clinicians.
Recognizing an anomalous case often requires suspicion when a patient’s clinical course fails to improve with appropriate therapy, when diagnostic tests are discordant with clinical impression, or when signs do not fit any known pattern.
Case 1 — The silent heart: MI without chest pain
Presentation: A 68-year-old woman with diabetes and hypertension visits with fatigue, nausea, and mild shortness of breath. No chest pain is reported. Initial ECG shows nonspecific changes; troponin is mildly elevated on repeat testing.
Discussion: Older adults, women, and patients with diabetes commonly present with “atypical” myocardial infarction (MI) — less chest pain, more gastrointestinal or generalized symptoms. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy can blunt ischemic pain. Reliance on chest pain alone delays diagnosis.
Key lessons:
- Use risk stratification tools and serial biomarkers for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
- Maintain high suspicion in high-risk populations even without classic symptoms.
- Early cardiology involvement and low threshold for cardiac imaging can prevent missed diagnosis.
Case 2 — Fever of unknown origin (FUO) reveals late-presenting endocarditis
Presentation: A 45-year-old man with low-grade fever for three weeks, weight loss, and night sweats. Multiple basic infectious and autoimmune screens are negative. Physical exam is unrevealing initially; later, a new murmur is noted. Blood cultures eventually grow a slow-growing organism; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) shows vegetations.
Discussion: Subacute bacterial endocarditis can present insidiously with nonspecific constitutional symptoms and may escape detection by routine tests, especially when caused by fastidious organisms (e.g., HACEK group, Coxiella, Bartonella). The intermittent bacteremia and small vegetations may yield variable culture results and negative transthoracic echocardiograms.
Key lessons:
- Persist with iterative testing and broaden the diagnostic net (repeat cultures, serologies for atypical organisms).
- Consider TEE when clinical suspicion persists despite negative TTE.
- Collaboration with infectious disease specialists is crucial for targeted diagnostics and therapy.
Case 3 — Neurological mimic: spinal epidural abscess presenting as isolated back pain
Presentation: A 52-year-old male with a history of IV drug use presents with severe lumbar back pain but no focal neurologic deficits initially. He is treated with analgesics and discharged. Over days he develops progressive lower-limb weakness and urinary retention. MRI reveals a spinal epidural abscess compressing the cord.
Discussion: Early spinal epidural abscess (SEA) may present only with pain, making diagnosis easily missed. Delays can lead to irreversible neurologic damage. Risk factors include diabetes, immunosuppression, recent spinal procedures, and IV drug use. Laboratory signs (elevated ESR/CRP) are often present but nonspecific.
Key lessons:
- Maintain low threshold for imaging (MRI with contrast) in high-risk patients with severe back pain and systemic symptoms.
- Check inflammatory markers; a high ESR/CRP in the right context warrants urgent imaging.
- Early surgical and antimicrobial management greatly improves outcomes.
Case 4 — Psychiatric mask: autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosed as primary psychiatric disorder
Presentation: A 23-year-old woman develops acute behavioral changes, psychosis, and catatonia. Initial psychiatric evaluation diagnoses a primary psychotic disorder. Over days cognitive decline, seizures, and autonomic instability emerge. CSF and neuronal antibody testing reveal anti-NMDA receptor antibodies.
Discussion: Autoimmune encephalitis, particularly anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, commonly presents with prominent psychiatric symptoms early in the course. Mislabeling as a primary psychiatric disorder can delay immunotherapy and worsen prognosis. Clues include acute/subacute onset, abnormal neurological signs, seizures, autonomic dysfunction, and CSF or MRI abnormalities.
Key lessons:
- Consider organic causes in first-episode psychosis, especially with rapid progression or neurologic features.
- Early neurologic consultation, CSF analysis, EEG, and antibody testing can change management.
- Prompt immunotherapy (steroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis) and tumor screening (e.g., ovarian teratoma) when indicated improve outcomes.
Case 5 — Environmental culprit: chronic cough from household chemical exposure
Presentation: A 34-year-old non-smoker develops a persistent dry cough and intermittent wheeze refractory to inhalers and steroids. Extensive pulmonary workup including chest CT and spirometry is unrevealing. Detailed social history uncovers frequent use of a new scented cleaning product and varnish in a poorly ventilated apartment.
Discussion: Environmental and toxic exposures can cause chronic respiratory symptoms that mimic asthma or chronic bronchitis. Diagnosis often requires thorough exposure history and, when available, workplace/home assessment or directed testing (e.g., bronchoscopy with lavage, provocation tests).
Key lessons:
- Take a comprehensive exposure history (occupational, household, hobbies).
- Trial of avoidance and environmental remediation can be diagnostic and therapeutic.
- Engage environmental health services when needed.
Diagnostic strategies for anomalous presentations
- Systematic re-evaluation: If a patient fails to respond as expected, revisit the history, re-examine, and reconsider earlier assumptions.
- Broad differential and “diagnostic timeouts”: Pause to list alternatives and rule them in/out deliberately.
- Use of targeted testing: Balance between over-testing and missing rare conditions — prioritize high-yield, low-risk tests first.
- Serial testing and observation: Some diagnoses (e.g., evolving MI, intermittent bacteremia) only reveal themselves over time.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration: Involve specialists early when cases deviate from common patterns.
- Awareness of cognitive biases: Anchoring, premature closure, and availability bias commonly derail diagnosis; structured reflective practice helps.
Ethical and system considerations
Anomalous cases often generate tension between resource use and patient safety. Extensive testing and consultations carry costs and risks, but misdiagnosis can cause severe harm. Institutions should support clinicians with:
- Access to rapid imaging and specialty consultation.
- Clinical pathways for common “red flag” symptoms (e.g., severe back pain with fever, first-episode psychosis with neurologic signs).
- Case-review forums and morbidity-and-mortality (M&M) conferences that focus on diagnostic errors and cognitive biases.
- Patient-centered communication about uncertainty, reasoning, and next steps.
How anomalous cases advance medicine
- Discovery of new diseases and syndromes (e.g., early case series of AIDS, newly described autoimmune encephalitides).
- Refinement of diagnostic criteria and guidelines.
- Improved diagnostic tools (e.g., more sensitive imaging, novel biomarkers).
- Educational value: they sharpen clinicians’ pattern recognition and humility.
Practical checklist when faced with an anomalous presentation
- Re-take focused history emphasizing timeline, exposures, and risk factors.
- Repeat focused physical exam; look for subtle or evolving signs.
- Order targeted repeat or advanced tests if clinically indicated (serial biomarkers, MRI/TEE/EEG).
- Consult relevant specialties early.
- Consider empiric therapy for high-risk, time-sensitive conditions while continuing diagnostics.
- Communicate uncertainty and plan clearly with the patient and family.
- Document reasoning and next steps; arrange close follow-up.
Anomalous medical presentations test clinical rigor, teamwork, and systems of care. They are reminders that medicine is both art and science: guidelines and algorithms guide most decisions, but curious, methodical clinicians and responsive systems are essential when the patient’s story departs from the expected. These cases, while challenging, are often where medical knowledge grows fastest — converting mystery into medicine.
Leave a Reply